Pago por servicios ecosistémicos de los recursos hídricos y su valoración económica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17268/manglar.2019.010Abstract
Con la finalidad de brindar información sobre el impacto de las iniciativas económicas vinculadas a atenuar los daños ambientales, el presente documento contiene revisión bibliográfica de los últimos 5 años sobre instrumentos económicos (pago por servicios ecosistémicos e impuestos ambientales) empleados en la mitigación del sobreuso de recursos hídricos. Así mismo clasifica diversos estudios de valoración economía en relación a la metodología que emplean para valorar determinados servicios ecosistémicos provistos por los recursos hídricos. Los que diseñan políticas públicas al implementar impuestos ambientales dirigidos a determinados niveles de consumo deben considerar aspectos cómo la acumulación de la contaminación para garantizar la sostenibilidad del suministro de servicios ecosistémicos. Incluir los valores obtenidos en valoración económica en el análisis costos – beneficio puede ayudar en la toma de decisiones de inversión en restauración o recuperación del capital natural.
Downloads
References
Agimass, F.; Lundhede, T.; Panduro, T.; Jacobsen, J. 2018. The choice of forest site for recreation: A revealed preference analysis using spatial data. Ecosystem Services 31: 445–454.
Aguilar, F.; Asantewaa, E. 2018. Water quality improvements elicit consistent willingness-to-pay for the enhancement of forested watershed ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 30: 158–171.
Boero, R., & Pasqualini, D. 2017. Regional water coefficients for U.S. industrial sectors. Water Resources and Industry 18: 60–70.
Brouwer, R.; Sheremet, O. 2017. The economic value of river restoration. Water Resources and Economics 17: 1–8.
Bunse, L.; Rendon, O.; Luque, S. 2015. What can deliberative approaches bring to the mone-tary valuation of ecosystem services? A literature review. Ecosystem Services: 88–97.
Chaikaew, P.; Hodges, A.W.; Grunwald, S. 2017. Estimating the value of ecosystem services in a mixed-use watershed: A choice experiment approach. Ecosystem Services 23: 228–237.
Chan, K.; Anderson, E.; Chapman, M.; Jespersen, K.; Olmsted, P. 2017. Payments for Ecosystem Services: Rife with Problems and Potential—For Transformation Towards Sustainability. Ecological Economics 140: 110–122.
Crespin, S.; Simonetti, J. 2016. Loss of ecosystem services and the decapitalization of nature in El Salvador. Ecosystem Services 17: 5–13.
Dang, Q.; Konar, M.; Reimer, J.; Baldassarre Di, G.; Lin, X. 2016. A theoretical model of water and trade. Advances in Water Resources 89: 32–41.
Dias, V.; Belcher, K. 2015. Value and provision of ecosystem services from prairie wetlands: A choice experiment approach. Ecosystem Services 15: 35–44.
Doherty, E.; Murphy, G.; Hynes, S.; Buckley, C. 2014. Valuing ecosystem services across water bodies: Results from a discrete choice experiment. Ecosystem Services 7: 89–97.
Edens, B.; Graveland, C. 2014. Experimental valuation of Dutch water resources according to SNA and SEEA. Water Resources and Economics 7: 66–81.
Fish, R.; Church, A.; Willis, C.; Winter, M.; Tratalos, J.; Haines-Young, R.; Potschin, M. 2016. Making space for cultural ecosystem services: Insights from a study of the UK nature improvement initiative. Ecosystem Services: 329–343.
Graveline, N. 2019. Combining flexible regula-tory and economic instruments for agriculture water demand control under climate change in Beauce. Water Resources and Economics (In press, 100143).
Grima, N.; Singh, S.; Smetschka, B.; Ringhofer, L. 2016. Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Latin America: Analyzing the performance of 40 case studies. Ecosystem Services 17: 24–32.
Guerra, R. 2016. Assessing preconditions for implementing a payment for environmental services initiative in Cotriguaçu (Mato Gros-so, Brazil). Ecosystem Services 21: 31–38.
Guilfoos, T.; Hayden, S.; Uchida, E.; Oyanedel-Craver, V. 2019. WTP for water filters and water quality testing services in Guatemala. Water Resources and Economics (In press, 100139).
Haavisto, R.; Santos, D.; Perrels, A. 2019. Determining payments for watershed servi-ces by hydro-economic modeling for optimal water allocation between agricultural and municipal water use. Water Resources and Economics 26: 100127.
Halkos, G.; Matsiori, S. 2016. Determining public attitudes and willingness-to-pay for artificial lakes protection. Water Resources and Economics 15: 15–27.
Henry, M.; Mittelhammer, R.; Loomis, J. 2018. An information-theoretic approach to estimating willingness to pay for river recreation site attributes. Water Resources and Economics 21: 17–28.
Ingram, J.; Wilkie, D.; Clements, T.; McNab, R.; Nelson, F.; Baur, E.; Foley, C. 2014. Evidence of Payments for Ecosystem Services as a mechanism for supporting biodiversity con-servation and rural livelihoods. Ecosystem Services 7: 10–21.
Jack, K. 2017. Environmental economics in developing countries: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 86: 1–7.
Jobstvogt, N.; Watson, V.; Kenter, J. 2014. Looking below the surface: The cultural ecosystem service values of UK marine protected areas (MPAs). Ecosystem Services 10: 97–110.
Knapp, T.; Kovacs, K.; Huang, Q.; Henry, C.; Nayga, R.; Popp, J.; Dixon, B. 2018. Willing-ness to pay for irrigation water when groundwater is scarce. Agricultural Water Management 195: 133–141.
Koundouri, P.; Rulleau, B. 2019. Valuing water: Selected applications. Water Resources and Economics 25: 1.
Kumar, P.; Kumar, M.; Garrett, L. 2014. Beha-vioural foundation of response policies for ecosystem management: What can we learn from Payments for Ecosystem Services(PES). Ecosystem Services 10: 128–136.
Kwayu, E.; Sallu, S.; Paavola, J. 2014. Farmer participation in the equitable payments for watershed services in Morogoro, Tanzania. Ecosystem Services 7: 1–9.
Laterra, P.; Nahuelhual, L.; Vallejos, M.; Berrouet, L.; Arroyo, E.; Enrico, L.; Villegas-Palacio, C. 2019. Linking inequalities and ecosystem services in Latin America. Ecosystem Services 36: 100875.
Leibbrandt, A.; Lynham, J. 2018. Does the allocation of property rights matter in the commons? Journal of Environmental Econo-mics and Management 36: 201–217.
Li, T.; McCluskey, J.; Messer, K. 2018. Ignorance Is Bliss? Experimental Evidence on Wine Produced from Grapes Irrigated with Recycled Water. Ecological Economics 153: 100–110.
Lubega, W.N.; Stillwell, A.S. 2019. Analyzing the economic value of thermal power plant cooling water consumption. Water Resources and Economics (In press, 100137).
Martin-Ortega, J.; Waylen, K. 2018. PES What a Mess? An Analysis of the Position of Envi-ronmental Professionals in the Conceptual Debate on Payments for Ecosystem Services. Ecological Economics 154: 218–237.
Martin, P. 2018. Managing the risks of ecosystem services markets. Ecosystem Services 29(B): 404–410.
Md Khalid, R.; Bin Mokhtar, M.; Jalil, F.; Ab Rahman, S.; Spray, C. 2018. Legal framing for achieving ‘good ecological status’ for Malaysian rivers: Are there lessons to be learned from the EU Water Framework Directive? Ecosystem Services 29: 251–259.
Mudavanhu, S.; Blignaut, J.; Stegmann, N.; Barnes, G.; Prinsloo, W.; Tuckett, A. 2017. The economic value of ecosystem goods and services: The case of Mogale’s Gate Biodiversity Centre, South Africa. Ecosystem Services 26: 127–136.
Orgill-Meyer, J.; Jeuland, M.; Albert, J.; Cutler, N. 2018. Comparing Contingent Valuation and Averting Expenditure Estimates of the Costs of Irregular Water Supply. Ecological Economics 146: 250–264.
Papenfus, M. 2019. Do housing prices reflect water quality impairments? Evidence from the Puget Sound. Water Resources and Economics (In press, 100133).
Peng, M.; Oleson, K. 2017. Beach recreatio-nalists’ Willingness to pay and economic implications of coastal water quality problems in Hawaii. Ecological Economics 136: 41–52.
Perez-Verdin, G.; Sanjurjo-Rivera, E.; Galicia, L.; Hernandez-Diaz, J.; Hernandez-Trejor, V.; Marquez-Linares, M. 2016. Economic valuation of ecosystem services in Mexico: Current status and trends. Ecosystem Services 21(A): 6–19.
Prayaga, P. 2017. Estimating the value of beach recreation for locals in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, Australia. Economic Analysis and Policy 53(C): 9–18.
Reddy, S.M.W.; McDonald, R.I.; Maas, A.S.; Rogers, A.; Girvetz, E.H.; Molnar, J.; DiMuro, J.L. 2015. Industrialized watersheds have elevated risk and limited opportunities to mitigate risk through water trading. Water Resources and Industry 11: 27–45.
Revollo-Fernández, D.A.; Rodríguez-Tapia, L.; Morales-Novelo, J.A. 2019. Economic value of water in the manufacturing industry located in the Valley of Mexico Basin, Mexico. Water Resources and Economics (In press, 100138).
Scheufele, G.; Bennett, J. 2017. Can payments for ecosystem services schemes mimic markets? Ecosystem Services 23: 30–37.
Sims, K.; Alix-Garcia, J. 2017. Parks versus PES: Evaluating direct and incentive-based land conservation in Mexico. Journal of Environ-mental Economics and Management 86: 8–28.
Spangenberg, J.; Settele, J. 2016. Value pluralism and economic valuation – defendable if well done. Ecosystem Services 18: 100–109.
Squires, D.; Vestergaard, N. 2018. Rethinking the commons problem: Technical change, know-ledge spillovers, and social learning. Journal of Environmental Economics and Mana-gement 91: 1–25.
Tonin, S. 2018. Citizens’ perspectives on marine protected areas as a governance strategy to effectively preserve marine ecosystem servi-ces and biodiversity. Ecosystem Services 34(B): 189–200.
Torbón, D.; Molina, C.; Vargas Cano, J. H. 2017. Pigouvian taxes and payments for environ-mental services in an economic model restricted by the resilience of a body of water. Water Resources and Economics 19: 28–40.
Weyland, F.; Mastrangelo, M.; Auer, A.; Barral, M.; Nahuelhual, L.; Larrazábal, A.; Villegas, C. 2019. Ecosystem services approach in Latin America: From theoretical promises to real applications. Ecosystem Services 35: 280-293.
Zhang, L.; Yu, X.; Jiang, M.; Xue, Z.; Lu, X.; Zou, Y. 2017. A consistent ecosystem services value-tion method based on Total Economic Value and Equivalent Value Factors: A case study in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Ecolo-gical Complexity 29: 40–48.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manglar is an open access journal distributed under the terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license
